Home » Forums » Website

Analytics: are these accurate?

Cody's picture
Submitted by Cody on Fri, 2007-08-17 13:35.

Link

What's up with the huge spike and fall?

‹ FasterBook OpenID ›
»
ckdake's picture

for a while searching for

Submitted by ckdake on Fri, 2007-08-17 13:44.

for a while searching for things like boobie pictures was leading to here. I don't remember the details, but theres a thread about it somewhere. Thats just the curve though. The actual numbers are real inaccurate. I have real real accurate numbers if you'd like to see them sometime. They won't be posted online though.

Alex's picture

pfffft numbers

Submitted by Alex on Fri, 2007-08-17 14:25.

When was the last time 5 did any thing nice to you?

The only good numbers are the ones in discreet algebra, because they are nasty but you can count on their not telling anyone.

Jeff's picture

Yep

Submitted by Jeff on Fri, 2007-08-17 15:15.

here is the thread that cause some of the spike: http://fastermustache.org/node/1873

But wasn't this also during the discussion of the new FM format change? This thread started in March: http://fastermustache.org/node/3328

And this one in Feb went on for 3 pages: http://fastermustache.org/node/3043

And let's not forget this little ditty: http://fastermustache.org/node/3480

ckdake's picture

I have traffic patterns for

Submitted by ckdake on Fri, 2007-08-17 16:20.

I have traffic patterns for each an every URL for the past 2 years. Graphs when I have time. heh.

spiffyk's picture

Search Analytics: Top Keywords

Submitted by spiffyk on Fri, 2007-08-17 18:00.

1. faster mustache
2. "bianchi pista" craigslist
3. cheap commuter bicycle
4. picture girl riding a bicycle
5. dragoncon dates

And FM is result #2 for that in Google.